
7.1 Example of the error definitions
Manual counting is assumed to be error-free.
|
Public Transport System: |
Hagener Straßenbahn AG |
|
Comparative counting: |
April 1, 1998 |
|
Vehicle: |
O 405 GN, with 3 doors |
|
Stops |
manual counting |
IRMA counting |
Error (absolute value) |
|||
|
In |
Out |
In |
Out |
Out |
Out |
|
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Total |
147 |
146 |
140 |
142 |
17 |
12 |
In this example,
|
the passenger error is |
= |
(140 + 142) - (147 +
146) |
x 100% = -4%, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
the balanced boarding passenger error is |
= |
140 - 147 |
x 100% = -5%, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
the balanced alighting passenger error is |
= |
142 - 146 |
x 100% = -3%, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
the unbalanced error is |
= |
17 + 12 |
x 100% = 10%. |
If no manually determined comparison figures are available for the evaluation of
the counting accuracy, the mean deviation can be calculated.
|
the mean deviation |
= |
absolute value of the difference between boarding and alighting passengers of automatic counting at all stops and all doors of a vehicle
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– of automatic counting at all stops and all doors of a vehicle |
In this example,
|
is the mean deviation |
= |
ABS(140 - 142) |
x 100% = 1%. |